12 responses to “Widget Application Performance”

  1. mrbiotech

    This is a really well-thought-out, well-conceived review detailing some pretty specific details about not only the user interactions with the programs, but also what it’s actually doing to your memory and CPU. Thanks for putting this together!

  2. Andrew

    I got a bunch of good notes from this, alot of which I’m sure youll see reflected in the weeks to come. One flaw with your review though. The average user isnt going to have a proxy setup in place. I dont think it was fair in that one case to compare the apps on a platform which does. Nonetheless, get online so we can figure out how to handle proxy settings automagically.

  3. Andrew

    Well you make good points. But one thing that you’ve overlooked, or rather assumed, is that Kapsules is intended for people who don’t take the time to read the documentation and content provided on the site. I, nor the app itself, make any claim that Kapsules is an out of the box, n00b ready app. It never has been, and has always required reading of some sort – mainly because I just havent had the time to make it THAT user friendly.

  4. Sven WagenhA?fers poetic:pixels

    Windows Widget Wahn

    Gleich mehrere Programme buhlen um die Gunst der Windows-Nutzer bei den On-Screen-Widgets, die bei den Macianern gleich fest im System verdrahtet sind. Joel Bennet hat in seinem Blog “Huddled Masses” eine schA?ne A?bersicht A?ber die aktue…

  5. stan

    Thanks for the unbiased and concise review! We’re currently very busy working on Release 0.8 (in beta testing at the moment) and I’m hoping you’ll find a lot of the major issues (lack of useful widgets, difficult widget installation process, etc.) disappear with this release.

    We’ve picked up a bad reputation of released part-complete products and it’s something I’m particularly taking a stand on – this is why, even after FOUR MONTHS of frenzied development R0.8 is still yet to make a public appearance! ;)

    I appreciate you’re a busy person, but if you do have a spare 30 minutes or so, we’d really like you to take a look at the latest beta – it’s perfectly usable and is much more joe-user friendly (as it should be) than its predecessor. Thanks!

  6. Xavier

    Hello,

    I came here from ‘blizzle’. I like this article this is very well written.

    stan, how do I help test? I would like to try a new widget softwares!

  7. woodland

    Thx!

    Good review, short, but informative.
    I really like the fact that you looked at the “ease of use” and the “performance”.

  8. stan

    For people who’re interested in testing dotWidget, please visit http://www.k23productions.com/ – thanks!

  9. Coogrrr

    I believe he fight is over. I suggest that the smaller companies make something that Yahoo.com may want to buy them out of. The fact that there is a widget DECOMPILER and creator and full information on creating them a GINORMOUS following already and its FREE make this a losing battle for the little guy.

    I would suggest making a full suite to run with konfab or other utilities that make it work better as you obviously have way more programming skill then those of us who consume you could write code to make konfab a single exe with all its widgets and sell that to yahoo.

    I am no fan of the bug guy winning but hey looking at this in reverse at least it was Yahoo not Microsquish who won. I am a MS baby as most are but I love the fact that MS needs to be taught how to do graphics that are AWESOME instead of the lame BMP graphics they do now.

    Guys I appreciate the efforts of the Kapsules and dotwidget but your oppurtunity is slipping away from you as you rush to market something that is already rev 2 and easy to program easy to use and easy for the n00b’s in the world and backed by what is to us endless cash.

    I want truly useful widgets for replacing my desktop as a whole like DesktopX and konfab is the thing that will do it. I need a full suite and hey maybe a explorer replacement! like the days of old where we could do PC TOOLS desktop or Norton Desktop! If you build it I will beta it and help you make it strong I will be first in line to BUY it too quote me on this PLEASE!

    I am not flamming nor am I stopping my support of you guys ROCK ON! but proper dierection kills most small companies or groups from achieving GREATNESS!

    -One who cares about us the little peeps!

  10. .jon

    I would have liked a little more backround info on the technical implementation.
    Personally I find desktop-widgets not really useful. For RSS a dedicated reader is much better (or Thunderbird). I have no interest in stock tickers and wheather forecasts are something I watch every evening in the news.

    Still, I like Kapsules the most, simply, becuase it allows for ActiveX scripting. That is, I could use (theoretically, I did not try it, since I do not really need it) ooREXX, Javascript, Python and others (I use the three named here) in order to create widgets.

    At this point I would like to mention something:

    We really need some more intelligent view on the desktop. Writing plugins/widgets in non-user scripting languages is ok, but there should be more. There should be always a possibility for Power(!)Users, ie. users with technical skills and the ability to master at least one programming lanugage somewhat (bash, Python, Javascript, PHP, VBScript) to create their own plugins.

    It would be nice if geoShell would allow full access to its API for ActiveScript.
    It would be even nicer, if geoShell and the Widget tools would use X(H)TML and CSS for their widgets/UIs. WIth the latest AJAX libraries full GUIs can be created. Many people know HTML and Javascript simply because they want to have a “cool” homepage. And these most likely would benefit.

    I also would like to see a more service-oriented approach in general, where I have function servers and UI clients, like a mediaplayer demon and a user/library interface, but that’s a completly other topic.

    However, this could be nice for Desktop expandability in general. A server, that has access to lower level stuff, delivering an API, which I can script at least with Javascript (+MochiKit or Prototype, jQuery, etc.) and make UIs with HTML+CSS.

    Dead simple.