3 responses to “Syncplicity — Terms of Servitude”

  1. karl prosser

    i think that many of the issues and faults with this EULA are not blatent attempts to screw the users, but terminology that hasn’t yet been reviewed enough.

  2. Roy Hall

    As a professional, I know the legalese of any contract is enough to scare the hell out of anyone. My contracts with my patients are designed to protect me and the patients as best as possible – both parties. I do believe the syncplicity terms are designed to protect both parties as much as possible. Their is no such thing – in my opinion – as a document which is totally neutral, but protective of all involved.

    Intent is extremely important in dealings in business. I suggest we look at the purpose this company is offering and make a decision “Is this what is helpful to me, or not?”

    Personally, I’ve known several memebers of this organization for some time. Their intent is to serve their clients with a quality product and service.

    I know this does nothingto protect the rights of the client. I would ask Mr. Bennet to draft a better agreement and submit it for legal review.