<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sick of Semantics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://huddledmasses.org/sick-of-semantics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://huddledmasses.org/sick-of-semantics/</link>
	<description>You can do more than breathe for free...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:36:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Beautifully Letdown &#187; Acronyms, Abbreviations, and other Semantics</title>
		<link>http://huddledmasses.org/sick-of-semantics/comment-page-1/#comment-10290</link>
		<dc:creator>Beautifully Letdown &#187; Acronyms, Abbreviations, and other Semantics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 14:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.huddledmasses.org/2004/10/27/sick-of-semantics/#comment-10290</guid>
		<description>[...] e with plugins that accomplish this is that they are too effective. Joel Bennett writes an article about his plugin that replaces acronyms and abbreviations with appropriate  an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] e with plugins that accomplish this is that they are too effective. Joel Bennett writes an article about his plugin that replaces acronyms and abbreviations with appropriate  an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no2</title>
		<link>http://huddledmasses.org/sick-of-semantics/comment-page-1/#comment-3052</link>
		<dc:creator>no2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.huddledmasses.org/2004/10/27/sick-of-semantics/#comment-3052</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pedantic Semantic 2: &lt;/strong&gt;

This is a technical article on the use of the HTML tags &lt;abbr&gt; and &lt;acronym;&gt;. If  you have any interest in this, but not much idea what these tags are for, I suggest you try reading the W3C&#039;s Recommendation (which is really the HTML speci...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pedantic Semantic 2: </strong></p>
<p>This is a technical article on the use of the <span class="caps">HTML</span> tags &lt;abbr&gt; and &lt;acronym;&gt;. If  you have any interest in this, but not much idea what these tags are for, I suggest you try reading the W3C&#8217;s Recommendation (which is really the <span class="caps">HTML</span> speci&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Thomas Rasmussen</title>
		<link>http://huddledmasses.org/sick-of-semantics/comment-page-1/#comment-1563</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Thomas Rasmussen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 01:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.huddledmasses.org/2004/10/27/sick-of-semantics/#comment-1563</guid>
		<description>Roger clearly knows his stuff. Semantics are meaningless! (Oh, the irony!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger clearly knows his stuff. Semantics are meaningless! (Oh, the irony!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://huddledmasses.org/sick-of-semantics/comment-page-1/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.huddledmasses.org/2004/10/27/sick-of-semantics/#comment-820</guid>
		<description>Semantic markup is silly. I see the same terms commonly defined and that by logical extension is foolish. If you don&#039;t know what RSS means, for instance, having it explained to you as Really Simply Syndiation means *nothing*. If you already have an RSS reader, meaning you actually care about RSS, the you don&#039;t need it explained.

And what&#039;s all the hoopla about defining something like HTML? Nobody who&#039;s reading a site cares what HTML means if they don&#039;t already know it. Letters to the Editor of a newspaper aren&#039;t burdened by the writers lack of knowledge about pics and points and ems and ens etc....

The only way semantics would be useful is to define really uncommon words. And so far, nobody does that. There&#039;s just too much work involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Semantic markup is silly. I see the same terms commonly defined and that by logical extension is foolish. If you don&#8217;t know what <span class="caps">RSS</span> means, for instance, having it explained to you as Really Simply Syndiation means <strong>nothing</strong>. If you already have an <span class="caps">RSS</span> reader, meaning you actually care about <span class="caps">RSS</span>, the you don&#8217;t need it explained.</p>
<p>And what&#8217;s all the hoopla about defining something like HTML? Nobody who&#8217;s reading a site cares what <span class="caps">HTML</span> means if they don&#8217;t already know it. Letters to the Editor of a newspaper aren&#8217;t burdened by the writers lack of knowledge about pics and points and ems and ens etc&#8230;.</p>
<p>The only way semantics would be useful is to define really uncommon words. And so far, nobody does that. There&#8217;s just too much work involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
