Comments on: A question about PowerShell Module Manifests http://huddledmasses.org/a-question-about-powershell-module-manifests/ You can do more than breathe for free... Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:40:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: PowerShell Module Manifests Tip: allowed cmdlets and variables http://huddledmasses.org/a-question-about-powershell-module-manifests/comment-page-1/#comment-214230 PowerShell Module Manifests Tip: allowed cmdlets and variables Mon, 18 Jan 2010 02:57:06 +0000 http://huddledmasses.org/?p=1382#comment-214230 [...] articles by ZemantaA question about PowerShell Module Manifests (huddledmasses.org)Another Module Manifest Gotcha (huddledmasses.org) Posted in Huddled | [...] [...] articles by ZemantaA question about PowerShell Module Manifests (huddledmasses.org)Another Module Manifest Gotcha (huddledmasses.org) Posted in Huddled | [...]

]]> By: Another Module Manifest Gotcha http://huddledmasses.org/a-question-about-powershell-module-manifests/comment-page-1/#comment-214225 Another Module Manifest Gotcha Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:42:46 +0000 http://huddledmasses.org/?p=1382#comment-214225 [...] Huddled Masses You can do more than breathe for free… « A question about PowerShell Module Manifests [...] [...] Huddled Masses You can do more than breathe for free… « A question about PowerShell Module Manifests [...]

]]> By: Jason Archer http://huddledmasses.org/a-question-about-powershell-module-manifests/comment-page-1/#comment-214162 Jason Archer Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:49:55 +0000 http://huddledmasses.org/?p=1382#comment-214162 My vote is for the PrivateData option. This seems to have the most benefit because you don't need a new function to get the information (just a little more typing). And it seems to have the least cost because it keeps the information in one file and it is easy to parse. There is a risk if Microsoft decides to support those fields (or others) in the future. That would make "upgrading" and dealing with older modules more annoying. My vote is for the PrivateData option. This seems to have the most benefit because you don’t need a new function to get the information (just a little more typing). And it seems to have the least cost because it keeps the information in one file and it is easy to parse.

There is a risk if Microsoft decides to support those fields (or others) in the future. That would make “upgrading” and dealing with older modules more annoying.

]]>